GCHQ and the college appear to attempt to influence 2 further French university applications.

) On Monday the 2nd of June, my application to a university was turned down.

As a result, on my private facebook page, I said a few things and happened to mention the possiblity in relation to the only remaining application that the University concerned were perhaps going to be “influenced” in some way into not giving me a place.

This is a reasonable suspicion given that this is a possible interpretation of what happened when an application for a course at a different university was rejected a couple of weeks ago.

Even if I blamed GCHQ on that occasion (I was to be fair being as polite as I could be under the circumstances), it is at the very least true that the university concerned as well as the authorities here show utter disdain (if not loathing) for the security of personal data and indeed security in general.

At the very least, it is true to say that, by default even if not by design, they are collaborating with the British because of such inaction and well laziness.

The comment as you can see refers to France in general and not the university as such

Screenshot from 2018-07-03 22-33-59

I write the last comment at at 10:26AM and the penultimate comment was in relation to the university concerned.

Screenshot from 2018-07-03 21-45-27

and within seconds at 10:26AM, I get a rejection from the university.
Screenshot from 2018-07-03 21-43-27

This suggests that they were reading my private facebook page and what I had said about being “influenced” is true or that they were “offended” at the suggestion that France is feckless which I’m afraid is true if one takes into account comments by some French nationals.

As a result today, I have made a final decision to leave France and to go to Cuba most probably. It’s a long story but let’s just say that there are issues here (which I don’t really want to go into for the moment) and it’s the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Anyway in relation my suspicion of “influence” today at 2:35, the following tweet appears on the St Catharines College twitter feed and mentions the fact that some fellow who apparently invented some wonder drug or other (did he?) has been appointed the CEO of company which he co-founded.

It just so happens that one of the people who has been given a job on the scientific advisory board is someone from the very university to which I applied and had been rejected by (University Paris Sud).

Screenshot from 2018-07-03 21-56-33

So in essence, I apply to a university outlining the fact that I left St Catharines college because of issues in relation to harassment and so on and somone from the university is given a job by someone from the college.

It might be done unawares but it would strike me as possibly the case that my application was turned down in exchange for him getting a job at the company concerned (In other words one might say that potentially they were bought off).

This would appear perhaps to be confirmed by the following.  As I begin taking material from the internet at 9:47 to compose this article, most notably the screenshots of my private facebook profile and a copy of the email, Amadeus and Interpol tweet.

Given the timing (Amadeus noticed through corporate spying by GCHQ that I was composing this article and Interpol tweeted exactly one second later), the content and subtext (outlined below) and the frequency of those tweets (Amadeus more often than not tweeting in response to things which I have said), both of these can be interprted as a statement to the effect that:

  1. Amadeus are going “Bah humbag, he caught us” and are stating that either
    1. my work is overhyped and the hoped for effect from the recruitment of the individual from Paris Saclay in derailing any ambition in that direction is not going to work.
    2. Amadeus are singalling that they intend to continue corporate spying.

And

  1. Interpol are
    1. shocked by the revelations on the part Amadeus and are signalling that they are going to look at stolen artwork instead of dealing with false allegations which are passsed onto them by the United Kingdom.
    2. signaling that they are going to do corporate spying for what can loosely be described as artwork on behalf of GCHQ and Amadeus

Personally, I am confident that the correct interpretation is number 1 in both cases in that it would be rather strange if it were to be the case that Interpol were doing corporate spying on behalf of Amadeus and Dr Hermann Hauser particularly given the fact that

  1. As outlined above, the have been strange interactions with St Catharines College and University Paris Sud and a rejection of my application
  2. Much of the stuff is no longer written down and I am wondering whetehr it is worth encrypting the rest.
  3. I have documentary evidence which proves that Amadeus have been attempting to steal from me.
  4. It might come across as revenge for the following.

Update 14:54 4/07/2018

I happened to be looking at reserving a ticket to cuba as  can be seen from the browsing record.Screenshot from 2018-07-04 14-36-59

It just so happens that between 1:22 and 1:23 local time, Cambridge tweet about treatement for gambling which can be a coded way of stating that I am gambling by going to Cuba.

Indeed this is signifed by the fact that five minutes later, I get a rejection for a university course which, due to a small mistake on my part, I thought had rejected me already.

Screenshot from 2018-07-04 14-40-03.png

But then this rejection is immaterial given the fact that it would be pointless to go. It shows disdain for the security of personal data and by default therefore, in not by design, it cooperates with GCHQ. Under such circumstances, what would be the point in doing research there?

It also happens that I was looking at completing my purchase of a ticket at 2:14PM

Screenshot from 2018-07-04 14-51-35

And Europol tweet

As with Interpol, this can be interpreted as them stating that

  1. they are going to look at stolen artwork instead of dealing with false allegations which are passsed onto them by the United Kingdom.
  2. signaling that they are going to do corporate spying for what can loosely be described as artwork on behalf of GCHQ and Amadeus

Personally, I am confident that the correct interpretation is number 1 in that, as with interpol  it would be rather strange if it were to be the case that they were doing corporate spying on behalf of Amadeus and Dr Hermann Hauser particularly given the fact that

  1. As outlined above, the have been strange interactions with St Catharines College and University Paris Sud and a rejection of my application
  2. Much of the stuff is no longer written down and I am wondering whether it is worth encrypting the rest.
  3. I have documentary evidence which proves that Amadeus have been attempting to steal from me.
  4. It might come across as revenge for the following.

I suppose however the proof of the pudding is in the eating and if there are any “problems”, it will prove the above.

Update 15:47 04/07/2018

Having said that it might be the case that the United Kingdom and its dependencies will attempt “influence” in other respects such as offering aid. Except under such circumstances, that would not be aid, it would be attempted briberyScreenshot from 2018-07-04 15-46-06.png

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s